Rousseau and Bentham on animal rights

with 3 comments

„By this means, an end can also be made to the ancient disputes regarding the participation of animals in the natural law. For it is clear that, lacking intelligence and liberty, they cannot recognize this law; but since they share to some extent in our nature by virtue of the sentient quality with which they are endowed, one will judge that they should also participate in natural right, and that man is subject to sme sort of duties toward them. It seems, in effect, that if I am obliged not to do any harm to my fellow man, it is less because he is a rational being than because he is a sentient being: a quality that, since it is common to both animals and men, sjhould at least give the former the right not to be needlessy mistreated by the latter” [Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1712-1778), Discourse on the Origin of Inequality]

„Other animals, which, on account of their interests having been neglected by the insensibility of the ancient jurists, stand degraded into the class of things. … The day has been, I grieve it to say in many places it is not yet past, in which the greater part of the species, under the denomination of slaves, have been treated … upon the same footing as … animals are still. The day may come, when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny. The French have already discovered that the blackness of skin is no reason why a human being should be abandoned without redress to the caprice of a tormentor. It may come one day to be recognized, that the number of legs, the villosity of the skin, or the termination of the os sacrum, are reasons equally insufficient for abandoning a sensitive being to the same fate. What else is it that should trace the insuperable line? Is it the faculty of reason, or perhaps, the faculty for discourse?…the question is not, Can they reason? nor, Can they talk? but, Can they suffer? Why should the law refuse its protection to any sensitive being?… The time will come when humanity will extend its mantle over everything which breathes…” [Jeremy Bentham (1748 – 1832), Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation]

3 răspunsuri

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Off-topic: „I tot I taw a putycat”, zise Tweety când reveni pe blog şi nu mai văzu o postare protestatară. Cenzura încă funcţioneşte, huh?!… 🙂


    octombrie 29, 2008 at 8:11 pm

  2. Nu cenzura „functioneste”, ci bunul simt. Atunci cind un om imi cere scuze (e drept – in particular, pe mail), nu il (mai) pot injura. Am retras acel post pentru ca mi s-au cerut scuze (si persoana respectiva NU stia despre acel post. Mi-a raspuns la mailul in care eu refuzam participarea la conferinta). Asa mi se pare normal. Daca eu iti gresesc cu ceva, sa spunem ca e normal sa ma „injuri” pe blog. Dar daca iti cer scuze, mi se pare normal sa retragi acel post.
    Cenzura? Dimpotriva, ma pregateam si cu partea a doua. Crezi insa ca ar fi fost corect?
    [Nota: daca vrei, iti pot forwarda e-mailul primit]


    octombrie 29, 2008 at 8:56 pm

  3. E ok. Am bănuit că s-a rezolvit cumva „broblema”. In niciun caz nu se mai justifica o „a doua parte”.


    octombrie 30, 2008 at 9:07 pm

Lasă un răspuns

Completează mai jos detaliile tale sau dă clic pe un icon pentru a te autentifica:


Comentezi folosind contul tău Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Google

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare /  Schimbă )

Conectare la %s

%d blogeri au apreciat: